Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  Triumph of the Euro?

With local interest rates soaring to 10% and even air force pilots on strike, it looks like Greece is going to get the financial aid it's been asking for, in the form of about $160 billion in loans over the next three years from the European Union and International Monetary Fund.  Without these loans, it is doubtful Greece would have been able to rollover its debt at any interest rate.  Greece would have defaulted.

By contrast, if Greece still used the drachma instead of the euro, we all know how their fiscal profligacy would have ended: with a major devaluation of the local currency and higher inflation.  With a devaluation, everyone who earned wages and salaries in drachma – in the public and private sector alike – as well as every (domestic or foreign) investor locked into earning drachma-denominated interest or investment returns from bank deposits, government and corporate debt, or equities would have taken a haircut.

But with Greece using the euro, devaluation is not an option.  As a result, Greece's pain will be concentrated in the sector that is causing most of the problem: government.  The conditions of the bailout, decided on by the EU and IMF, require Greece to freeze government salaries, eliminate bonuses (amounting to two months' pay), and lift the retirement age to 60 for government workers.  The aid package also requires Greece to raise its value-added tax to 23% from 21% and also increase some excise taxes, but there will also be other large (as yet unspecified) cuts in government spending, too.

While the tax hikes are disappointing, we believe the focus on restraining government spending, rather than using devaluation, represents a triumph of the euro.

We realize that some investors have been spooked by the recent debt turmoil in Greece and the risk of it spreading to Portugal and Spain.  However, one of the lessons of the early 1980s was that US equities can still do very well even when foreign economies are in turmoil.

In 1982, Argentina, Mexico, and Venezuela all defaulted.  Brazil and Chile defaulted in 1983.  Smaller countries that defaulted, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Panama, Peru, and Uruguay, rounded out the list of almost every Latin American country.  In 1983, the eight largest US banks had 260% of their capital lent to Latin American countries.  Despite this, in 1982-83 the total return on the S&P 500, including both share appreciation and dividends, was 49%.

Today, as far as we know, no US financial institution has any kind of significant exposure to Greece or any other European country. We are not saying that European debt problems are not significant.  But when the US is recovering from a steep recession, debt problems elsewhere can be a wall of worry we end up climbing.

Click here to view the full commentary.

Posted on Monday, May 3, 2010 @ 10:26 AM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
Bob Stein on Greek debt and the outlook for the US economy
Brian discusses the Fed's rate decision on the Kudlow Report
The first estimate for Q1 real GDP growth is 3.2% at an annual rate
NABE survey shows recession started in Q3 2008, not late 2007
Fed Twiddles Its Thumbs
The Danger of Zero Percent Interest Rates
New single-family home sales surged 26.9% in March to a 411,000 annual rate
New orders for durable goods declined 1.3% in March
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved.