Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  Quantitative Easing and the Bond Market – How Big is the Fed’s Role? - Part 1 of 3
Posted Under: GDP • Government • Markets • Fed Reserve • Interest Rates • Bonds • Stocks
Supporting Image for Blog Post

 
The world can be divided into two clans these days – a dominate "Bear" clan and a minority "Optimistic" clan. The Optimists are relative optimists. For example, we see a Plow Horse economy (growing at about 2% real GDP) and an undervalued stock market that sometimes rises rapidly, but might not always do so.

The Bear clan is very pessimistic, believing the economy would still be in recession if it weren't for Quantitative Easing. They argue that QE bond buying and money printing are artificially lowering interest rates, driving all economic growth, and lifting stock prices. These Bears argue that any models showing equity prices undervalued provide "false" readings because they are based on "manipulated" market prices. According to the Bears, since QE is so massively disorienting to the financial markets, nothing is at it seems.

This Bear theory has scared many investors into believing that when the Fed "tapers" or "ends" its bond buying campaign, which it must do eventually, interest rates will rise sharply. This will, in turn, cause a massive drop in stock prices, a collapse in housing, and another recession. In other words, anything positive you thought was happening was just a mirage caused by Quantitative Easing.

But, is any of this true? We think not. As it turns out, and as can be seen in the chart above, because the Treasury has issued so much more debt than usual in recent years, the Fed's unusually large purchases of debt have kept its ownership share of Treasury bonds well within the normal range of history. In fact, the Fed held a larger share of total Treasury bonds outstanding (20%) in 2002 than it does today (18%).

Without QE, the Fed would hold a significantly lower share of debt than it has in the past. And, even if the Fed maintains QE at its current pace for the next twelve months, we estimate the Fed's share of marketable Treasury debt would rise to just 21%, slightly above the Fed's share back in 2002.

In other words, it appears that the Bears are blowing the impact of QE out of proportion when it comes to the level of interference in the Treasury bond market.

(Under the category, of "minds (great or not) think alike, but some are faster at posting than others," we want to credit Scott Grannis at Calafia Beach Pundit, a friend and terrific economist, for writing early last week on the same topic. Please feel free to catch up on his take on the topic here.)
Posted on Monday, November 25, 2013 @ 10:37 AM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
The Producer Price Index (PPI) Declined 0.2% in October
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) Declined 0.1% in October
Existing Home Sales Declined 3.2% in October to a 5.12 Million Annual Rate
Retail Sales Rose 0.4% in October
Steady As She Goes
Industrial production declined 0.1% in October
The Chairwoman and QE
The Trade Deficit in Goods and Services Came in at $41.8 Billion in September
Nonfarm Productivity Increased at a 1.9% Annual Rate in Q3
Taper Talk
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved.