Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  The Trade Deficit in Goods and Services Came in at $54.9 Billion in August
Posted Under: Data Watch • Trade
Supporting Image for Blog Post

 
Implications: The Trump Administration may bemoan the larger trade deficit in August, as exports grew but imports grew faster.  But, as a result, the total volume of trade (imports plus exports), which signals how much businesses and consumers interact across the US border, increased by 0.4% in August, and that's what matters most about today's report.  However, compared to a year ago, exports and imports are essentially unchanged.  Of particular note in today's report, exports of petroleum products (think oil and gasoline) rose 6.8% in August, while imports decline 7.7%. As a result, the ratio of petroleum imports to exports fell to 1.02, the lowest reading since record keeping began back in 1989, and representing a virtual balance of trade. And it's worth noting, the attack on Saudi Arabian oil facilities that roiled the markets and likely pushed more export activity towards the US didn't occur until mid-September, so that isn't reflected in today's report.  It's possible that the ratio could dip below one in next month's report for the first time ever. For comparison, the US imported petroleum products at more than eleven times the rate it exported as recently as 2005.  Despite the progress, there is a lot of angst out there from the pouting pundits that the China trade battle is still a long way from done.  We think the worst-case-scenarios much discussed by the financial press will prove excessively pessimistic, as they so often do.  We still don't believe an all-out trade war (like the Smoot-Hawley tariff act) will materialize, but rather that these short-term skirmishes will lead to longer-term gains for all countries involved. We have already seen outlined trade deals with Mexico, Canada, and Japan. Total trade from these three is far bigger than with China, yet that's what the media obsesses over.  China is hurting, and further tariffs ratchet up the pressure to get a deal done.  So far this year, US imports from China are down 13.2% from the same period in 2018, while up 31.5% from Vietnam, 14.0% from Taiwan, 7.6% from India, 6.8% from South Korea, and 2.2% from Mexico.  Companies are shifting production out of China.  And the longer this drags on, the worse the outcome will be for China. The list of companies leaving China continues to grow and, at some point, the damage will become too much. Yes, this is hurting growth in the US to a small degree, sure. But the economic damage to China is greater.  It's in everyone's best interest to get a deal done.

Click here for a PDF version
Posted on Friday, October 4, 2019 @ 12:17 PM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
Nonfarm Payrolls Rose 136,000 in September
The ISM Non-Manufacturing Index Fell to 52.6 in September
The ISM Manufacturing Index Declined to 47.8 in September
Repo Turmoil
M2 and C&I Loan Growth
Personal Income Rose 0.4% in August
New Orders for Durable Goods Rose 0.2% in August
Real GDP Growth in Q2 was Unrevised at a 2.0% Annual Rate
New Single-Family Home Sales Increased 7.1% in August
Fear the Spending, Not the Debt
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved.