Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  The Trade Deficit in Goods and Services Came in at $49.4 Billion in April
Posted Under: Data Watch • Employment • Trade
Supporting Image for Blog Post

 

Implications: Before we look at the trade report, this morning we got the latest reading on initial unemployment claims, which came in at 1.877 million last week, maintaining the series of extremely high readings since March.  However, initial claims dropped, 249,000 last week and have dropped nine weeks in a row after peaking at 6.87 million in late March.  We are also closely following continuing claims, data for which lag initial claims by one week. Continuing claims rose 649,000 to 21.49 million in the week ending May 23, but are still down more than 3 million from the peak the week of May 8th.  This is important because typically the economy hits bottom around the time continuing claims peak.  In other words, the economy may have hit bottom in May, be growing on a monthly basis in June and on a quarterly basis in the third quarter.  Now back to trade where the deficit in goods and services came in at $49.4 billion, with both imports and exports declining substantially, consistent with a decline in both US and global economic activity.  Exports fell faster than imports, dropping by the most on record for any month, which is why the trade deficit grew.  The total volume of trade (imports plus exports), which signals how much businesses and consumers interact across the US border, dropped 16.7% in April and is down 24.8% versus a year ago.  Notably, the US registered its fourth straight month with a trade surplus in the dollar value of petroleum and petroleum products, and the sixth surplus in the last seven months.  In other news today, nonfarm productivity was revised higher to a -0.9% annual rate in the first quarter from an original estimate of -2.5%.  Output was revised slightly lower while hours worked were revised substantially lower, which boosted output per hour. Productivity is still up 0.7% from a year ago but don't expect this to last.  Productivity should temporarily fall further in Q2 as the fallout from the coronavirus and the government's actions to close business to "flatten the curve" lead to further significant drops in output.  "Real" (inflation-adjusted) compensation continued to rise, in Q1, revised up to a 2.9% annualized pace. On the manufacturing front, productivity was revised up and now shows growth at a 0.3% annualized pace in Q1 as hours declined at a faster pace than output.  Once the economy starts recovering in the second half of the year, productivity should revive, as well.

Click here  for PDF version

Posted on Thursday, June 4, 2020 @ 10:15 AM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
Coronavirus and Economic Update 6/3/20
The ISM Non-Manufacturing Index Rose to 45.4 in May
Coronavirus High Frequency Data
The ISM Manufacturing Index Rose to 43.1 in May
More Green Shoots
M2 and C&I Loan Growth
Personal Income Surged 10.5% in April
Coronavirus High Frequency Data
Real GDP Growth in Q1 was Revised to a -5.0% Annual Rate
Coronavirus and Economic Update 5/27/20
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved.