Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  Not Goldilocks
Posted Under: Employment • GDP • Government • Inflation • ISM Non-Manufacturing • Markets • Monday Morning Outlook • Fed Reserve • Interest Rates • Spending • Bonds • Stocks

Not long after Friday’s Employment Report multiple analysts and commentators were calling it a “goldilocks” report, by which they meant it showed that the economy was neither “too hot” nor “too cold,” but instead, “just right.”

In turn, the theory goes, the Federal Reserve could stop raising short-term rates earlier and at a lower peak than previously expected, inflation would continue to cool, and the economy could pull-off an elusive “soft landing.”

The biggest headlines from the Employment Report were definitely good news.  Nonfarm payrolls rose 223,000 in December, beating the consensus expected 203,000.  Meanwhile, civilian employment, an alternative (although volatile) measure of jobs that includes small-business start-ups, surged 717,000.  Rapid job creation helped push the unemployment rate down to 3.5%, tying the lowest level since Joe Namath was a reigning Super Bowl champion.  (If you’re a Millennial or Gen Z, yes, that’s the same guy in the Medicare commercials.)

But, behind the headlines, the data were not as good.  Temporary help service jobs (temps) fell 35,000 in December, the fifth straight monthly decline, to a level of temp jobs below a year ago.  Why are these jobs important to watch?   Because, when businesses face increased demand, the quickest way to respond is hiring temporary help.  And the same thing happens in the opposite direction.

Meanwhile, the total number of hours worked in the private-sector ticked down 0.1% in December, the second consecutive monthly decline.  Even though payrolls were up, total hours worked data show less work was done.  Putting it all together, this is the equivalent of losing 125,000 jobs in December, not gaining jobs.  Fewer temporary workers and fewer hours worked suggest some weakness in the job market.  What this means is that businesses are still hiring, but their workers have less to do.

Why would businesses do that?  Because finding qualified workers has been unusually difficult during the re-opening from the COVID shutdowns.  In turn, many firms might be willing to keep hiring workers until it’s clear the economy is in a recession.  But this also means that if a recession happens – and we continue to think it will – more workers have to be let go.

The figure that the optimists focused on the most was the wage report, which showed a relatively moderate gain of 0.3% in average hourly earnings in December and a gain of 4.6% versus a year ago.  Moderate wage growth, the conventional thinking goes, diffuses the potential for a “wage-price spiral” that keeps inflation high or even pushes it higher.  But this is a basic misunderstanding of inflation dynamics.  As Milton Friedman taught us, it’s loose money that causes inflation to go up.  The fact that wages sometimes go up faster at the same time is also a sign of loose money, but it’s not a sign that wage growth causes inflation.

What analysts, commentators, and the markets should have spent more time chewing over was the ISM Services report, which screamed stagflation.  The overall index came in at 49.6, well below consensus expectations and the first reading in contraction territory since the onset of COVID.  In fact, excluding very early COVID, it was the first sub-50 reading since 2009.  Meanwhile, although the prices paid index declined to 67.6 (versus 70.0 in November), that’s still higher than it ever was between mid-2011 and early-2021.

This week’s CPI report should show tame overall inflation for December itself, but that’ll largely be due to falling energy prices.  The ISM report suggests inflation isn’t going back to the Fed’s 2.0% target anytime soon.

Put it all together and it looks like both the surge in M2 growth in 2020-21 (which created the inflation) and the abrupt slowdown in 2022 (which would cause slower growth) are still wending their way through the economy.  If so, we should see weak economic data, soon.  Further forward, if the Federal Reserve maintains slow M2 growth – an open question given the Fed’s reluctance to focus publicly on the monetary aggregates when setting policy – we could see a major slowdown in inflation in 2024.  Time, and the direction of monetary policy, will tell.

Right now, it looks like Real GDP expanded at a 2.5 – 3.0% rate in the last quarter of 2022.  But how fast it’s growing in the first quarter of 2023 – if at all – is anyone’s guess.    

Brian S. Wesbury – Chief Economist

Robert Stein, CFA – Deputy Chief Economist

Click here for a PDF version

Posted on Monday, January 9, 2023 @ 10:11 AM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
High Frequency Data Tracker 1/6/2023
The ISM Non-Manufacturing Index Dropped to 49.6 in December
Nonfarm Payrolls Increased 223,000 in December
The Trade Deficit in Goods and Services Came in at $61.5 Billion in November
The ISM Manufacturing Index Declined to 48.4 in December
The Housing Outlook for 2023
High Frequency Data Tracker 12/30/2022
High Frequency Data Tracker 12/23/2022
New Single-Family Home Sales Increased 5.8% in November
Personal Income Rose 0.4% in November
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved.