Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  The ISM Manufacturing Index Declined to 46.8 in July
Posted Under: Data Watch • Employment • Government • Home Sales • Housing • ISM • Markets • Spending
Supporting Image for Blog Post

 

Implications:  Another ugly report on the US manufacturing sector as the ISM Manufacturing index missed consensus expectations once again in July, falling to an eight-month low of 46.8.  Activity has now contracted for twenty out of the last twenty-one months.  Looking at the details of the report, just five of the eighteen major manufacturing industries reported growth, with eleven reporting contraction, and two reporting no change.  Both output and demand contributed to the drop in the overall index, as the production index fell to 45.9 – the lowest level since the COVID Lockdown months – while the new orders index fell further into contraction territory to 47.4, marking the twenty-first month in the last twenty-three where the index has been below 50.  Given weak demand, companies have turned to reducing their order backlog. That index, which remained deep in contraction territory at 41.7, has stayed below 50 for twenty-two consecutive months.  Survey comments from manufacturing companies have noted dwindling backlogs, which are prompting them to take cost actions.  This can be clearly seen in the employment index, which plunged to the lowest level since the COVID Lockdown months at 43.4.  Of the eighteen major manufacturing industries, just two reported an increase in employment, while thirteen reported a decline.  The weakness seen in the ISM Manufacturing index underpins a growing list of economic data pointing to a slowdown in growth.  We expect to see continued manufacturing weakness in the second half of 2024 as the bill for reckless and artificial spending by our government from the COVID years comes due and the lagged impacts from the drop in the M2 measure of the money supply from early 2022 through late 2023 take effect.  In other news this morning, construction spending declined 0.3% in June, led by large drops in homebuilding and commercial projects.  In recent housing news, the Case-Shiller index increased 0.3% in May and is up 5.9% from a year ago. Meanwhile, the FHFA index was unchanged in May, but is up 5.8% from a year ago.  Also on the housing front, pending home sales, which are contracts on existing homes, rose 4.8% in June following a 1.9% decline in May. Plugging these figures into our model suggests existing home sales, which are counted at closing, will rise slightly in July.

Click here for a PDF version

Posted on Thursday, August 1, 2024 @ 11:58 AM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
Nonfarm Productivity Increased at a 2.3% Annual Rate in Q2
September is Live
Want Affordable Housing? Build Homes, Cut Government
Personal Income Rose 0.2% in June
Three on Thursday - Some Cracks in Employment
New Orders for Durable Goods Declined 6.6% in June
Real GDP Increased at a 2.8% Annual Rate in Q2
New Single-Family Home Sales Declined 0.6% in June
A Mid-Convention Election Outlook
Existing Home Sales Declined 5.4% in June
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved.