Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 
 
Blog Home
 

  Alternatives Update 4th Quarter 2016
Posted Under: Alternatives

In the 4th quarter, Alternative Investment ("Alternatives") returns were for the most part directionally the same as in the 3rd quarter with commodities being a notable exception by switching from negative to positive. The magnitude of returns were, however, generally more muted. Year-to-date, ten of 11 categories had positive returns, though short biased was essentially flat for the year. The performance themes in the quarter were fairly clear cut. Equity beta (event driven, volatility arbitrage, hedged equity), credit (distressed, credit arbitrage), and inflation hedging exposures (commodities) did well, while low/negative beta (equity market neutral, macro, managed futures, short bias) and interest rate sensitive exposures (real estate) struggled. As in the 3rd quarter, returns mostly aligned with the rank order correlation to the S&P 500, with real estate and commodities being exceptions. Real assets (commodities and real estate), which had both done very well in the first half of the year, diverged dramatically in the second half of the year due to their differing interest rate sensitivities amidst a rising rate outlook in the United States. Commodities rallied sharply during the fourth quarter, while real estate headed further into negative territory. Managed Futures continued its elegiac performance posting near bottom returns for the quarter and the poorest returns for the entire year. Managed futures, commodities, and macro have historically shown low correlations to stocks and bonds; thus, they serve as potentially strong portfolio diversifiers. Strategies such as credit arbitrage, event driven, hedged equity, et al., which have higher correlations with equities, provide attractive risk/return profiles through lower volatility. These characteristics may allow investors to broaden their investment choices and create more efficient portfolios. Correlations using monthly returns over the past two years shows these historic relationships remain intact.

Click here to continue reading.

Posted on Monday, January 23, 2017 @ 7:21 AM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts


 PREVIOUS POSTS
Money Market Reform and the Opportunity for Enhanced Cash ETFs
Third Quarter 2016 CEF Review
Alternatives Update 3rd Quarter 2016
Broad Commodity ETFs Gain Traction in Q2: Will the Trend Continue?
Alternatives Update 2nd Quarter 2016
Second Quarter 2016 CEF Review
Three-Year Anniversary for the Largest Actively Managed High Yield ETF
First Quater 2016 CEF Review
Are Expense Ratios a Dependable Predictor of Returns for Large Cap US Equity ETFs?
Staying the Course with FVD
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved.