Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  The ISM Manufacturing Index Declined to 51.5 in March
Posted Under: Data Watch • ISM
Supporting Image for Blog Post

 
Implications: The aftermath of the west coast port shutdowns, unusually cold winter weather and a drop in oil drilling continue to weigh on manufacturing activity across the country. The ISM manufacturing index, which measures factory sentiment around the country, declined in March, but remained above 50 for a 27th consecutive month. We don't believe the decline from 58.1 in August to the current reading of 51.5 is anything to worry about. Remember that the economy was unusually strong in the summer of last year as it recovered from bad weather in the first quarter of 2014. The fundamentals of the economy have not changed in any significant way. According to the Institute for Supply Management, the average overall index level of 52.6 seen through the first three months of 2015 is consistent with real GDP growth of 3% annually. This ISM-calculated relationship has over-estimated real GDP growth in the past several years, although mid-2014 real growth came close. As a result, we see today's data as consistent with our forecast of a roughly 1% real GDP growth rate in Q1. The ISM report shows 10 industries expanded in March, while 7 contracted, but the pace of decline in oil drilling dragged the index down. On the inflation front, the prices paid index remained depressed at 39.0 in February. No major surprise here given the continued pressure on energy prices over the past month. The employment index dipped in March to 50.0, signaling no change in manufacturing employment over the past month. Taken as a whole, this month's report shows the Plow Horse continues to plod forward. In other news this morning, construction declined 0.1% in February, exactly as the consensus expected. A drop in government projects (power plants and water supply) as well as a slower pace of single-family home building, offset stronger commercial construction, which was led by manufacturing facilities, offices, and hotels. Look for a rebound in the next couple of months as weather patterns return to normal. On the housing front, the Case-Schiller index, a measure of national home prices, increased 0.6% in January and is up 4.5% versus a year ago. All twenty major metro areas are up in the past year, led by Denver, Miami, and Dallas. In broader economic news this morning, the ADP index, a measure of manufacturing payrolls, increased 189,000 in March. Plugging this into our models suggests Friday's official report will show nonfarm payrolls up 225,000, another solid month.

Click here for PDF version
Posted on Wednesday, April 1, 2015 @ 11:01 AM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
Personal Income Increased 0.4% in February
Rate Hikes Won't Kill Housing
M2 and C&I Loan Growth
Real GDP Growth in Q4 was Unchanged at a 2.2% Annual Rate
New Orders for Durable Goods Declined 1.4% in February
New Single-Family Home Sales Rose 7.8% in February
The Consumer Price Index Increased 0.2% in February
Existing Home Sales Increased 1.2% in February
Don't Fret Student Debt
M2 and C&I Loan Growth
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved.