Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  Nonfarm Productivity Declined at a 1.9% Annual Rate in the First Quarter
Posted Under: Data Watch • Productivity
Supporting Image for Blog Post

 
Implications: The government's first report on real GDP growth in Q1 showed a scant gain of 0.2% at an annual rate, even though job growth continued during the quarter. So it should come as no surprise that nonfarm productivity declined in Q1. Output fell slightly, while hours climbed 1.7% at an annual rate, so output per hour declined at a 1.9% annual rate. In spite of the decline in Q1, productivity is up 0.6% from a year ago, exactly the same as the 0.6% annualized growth rate of the previous four years. However we suspect the government is underestimating output in the increasingly important service sector, which means growth and productivity are higher than the official data show. (For example, do the data fully capture the value of new technologies like smartphone apps, the tablet, the cloud,...etc.?) Remember when you had to look in separate places for the weather, directions, business contacts, email, news, taxis... the list goes on and on. Now all you have to do is reach into your pocket, or for some, look at your watch. We believe the figures from the government miss the value of these improvements, which means our standard of living is improving faster than the official reports show. Still even on the manufacturing side, where it's easier to measure output per hour, productivity is up only 1.4% in the past year. This is consistent with overall productivity growth of 1.5% on average per year from 1973 through 1995. However it's slower than the 2.1% average per year since 1995. In spite of the problems with measurement, we anticipate faster productivity growth over the next few years as new technology increases output in all areas of the economy. The declining unemployment rate, decline in labor force participation, and faster growth in wages should create more pressure for efficiency gains, while the technological revolution continues to provide the inventions that make those gains possible. Overall, for 2015-16, we look for faster productivity growth than in the past five years. In other news this morning, the ADP index, which measures private-sector payrolls, showed a gain of 169,000 in April. Our models now forecast a nonfarm gain of 275,000, although the forecast may change slightly tomorrow based on new data for unemployment claims.

Click here for PDF version
Posted on Wednesday, May 6, 2015 @ 10:45 AM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
The ISM Non-Manufacturing Index Increased to 57.8 in April
The Trade Deficit in Goods and Services Came in at $51.4 Billion in March
@WSJopinion vs. @BenBernanke
M2 and C&I Loan Growth
War: @WSJopinion Vs. @BenBernanke
The ISM Manufacturing Index was Unchanged in April at 51.5
Personal Income was Unchanged in March
Key Seven Weeks Starts Now
The First Estimate for Q1 Real GDP Growth is 0.2% at an Annual Rate
M2 and C&I Loan Growth
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved.