Home Logon FTA Investment Managers Blog Subscribe About Us Contact Us

Search by Ticker, Keyword or CUSIP       
 
 

Blog Home
   Brian Wesbury
Chief Economist
 
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
   Bob Stein
Deputy Chief Economist
Bio
X •  LinkedIn
 
  Quantitative Easing and the Bond Market – Can Private Buyers Absorb the Debt? - Part 3 of 3
Posted Under: GDP • Government • Markets • Fed Reserve • Interest Rates • Bonds
Supporting Image for Blog Post

 
Since 1975, the amount of marketable debt held outside Federal Reserve (known as privately-held debt) has increased by $9.3 trillion, or $242 billion per year. During the same time frame, GDP has averaged $8.1 trillion per year. In other words, on average, since 1975 the private markets have absorbed Treasury debt equal to 3% of GDP. Over some periods it was more than average, over other periods, less. But there is no clear and consistent relationship between this burden on the private sector and interest rates.

If QE were to completely end tomorrow, the amount of Treasury debt that would have to be absorbed would not be particularly large relative to the size of the US economy. If the Fed suddenly goes "cold turkey" on QE but continues to just rollover the Treasury debt it already owns, all other purchasers of Treasury debt would have to absorb an amount roughly equivalent to the size of the budget deficit, which we think will be about 3% of GDP in the year ahead, no different than the long-term average of how much Treasury debt private markets have absorbed.

More likely, the Fed will taper purchases next year (to about $20B/month) rather than going cold turkey, adding about $250 billion to its holdings. If so, the private markets would have to absorb Treasury debt equal to only about 1.5% of GDP in the next twelve months, low by historical standards. In turn, by the time the Fed completely stops its purchases, the budget deficit should be small enough, at least in the medium term, to keep the amount of debt the private markets need to absorb below the long-term average of 3% of GDP.

We hope the charts and analysis in this series (click here for part one and click here for part two) helps make our case that QE itself is not the driving force behind lower long-term rates. While we believe that interest rates are headed higher in the years ahead, QE itself (or ending it) is not the reason for our forecast. Rates have been held artificially low by the Fed's commitment to low short-term rates, which cannot last forever.

QE itself is just a signaling mechanism and is nowhere near as powerful as the Bears think it is. Ending QE will end a chapter of Fed policy we wish had never come and hope will never return. But, the impact of QE on the economy and financial markets has been much less than many have come to believe.
Posted on Monday, November 25, 2013 @ 10:53 AM • Post Link Print this post Printer Friendly

These posts were prepared by First Trust Advisors L.P., and reflect the current opinion of the authors. They are based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
Search Posts
 PREVIOUS POSTS
Quantitative Easing and the Bond Market – Has QE Held Down Rates? - Part 2 of 3
Quantitative Easing and the Bond Market – How Big is the Fed’s Role? - Part 1 of 3
The Producer Price Index (PPI) Declined 0.2% in October
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) Declined 0.1% in October
Existing Home Sales Declined 3.2% in October to a 5.12 Million Annual Rate
Retail Sales Rose 0.4% in October
Steady As She Goes
Industrial production declined 0.1% in October
The Chairwoman and QE
The Trade Deficit in Goods and Services Came in at $41.8 Billion in September
Archive
Skip Navigation Links.
Expand 20242024
Expand 20232023
Expand 20222022
Expand 20212021
Expand 20202020
Expand 20192019
Expand 20182018
Expand 20172017
Expand 20162016
Expand 20152015
Expand 20142014
Expand 20132013
Expand 20122012
Expand 20112011
Expand 20102010

Search by Topic
Skip Navigation Links.

 
The information presented is not intended to constitute an investment recommendation for, or advice to, any specific person. By providing this information, First Trust is not undertaking to give advice in any fiduciary capacity within the meaning of ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code or any other regulatory framework. Financial professionals are responsible for evaluating investment risks independently and for exercising independent judgment in determining whether investments are appropriate for their clients.
Follow First Trust:  
First Trust Portfolios L.P.  Member SIPC and FINRA. (Form CRS)   •  First Trust Advisors L.P. (Form CRS)
Home |  Important Legal Information |  Privacy Policy |  California Privacy Policy |  Business Continuity Plan |  FINRA BrokerCheck
Copyright © 2024 All rights reserved.